Skip to main content

Price comparison Internet in USA and India

While this trip to India did not provide me enough time to set up all the infrastructure, I was happy with the technological advancements India witnessed in the past four years.  As I left to USA, in November 2004, my house had only dialup connection. Today we have at least three service providers including one WiMax provider.

We have a BSNL broadband connection, Tata Photon+ wireless Internet Service to complement each other.  Now I will compare the cost of these Internet Services with those in the USA.  I benchmark this with respect to General browsing, Downloading/Video, and VPN users.

The main advantage in the USA is that the Internet is not limited.  And not capped in terms of bandwidth.  The average speed of an Internet connection(cable), in the USA tops about 15 Mbps. Considering the fact that this is unlimited, one in India would expect a high costs associated with that.  But Comcast provide such high speed Internet connection for about $20 a month for the first six months and $45 thereafter.

In India however, there are various plans with various speeds and limits on total transfer.  We have a plan that costs us 600 rupees per month. We have 2.5 GB of free transfer, and 0.8 rupees per MB after the limit.  And this gives us about 2 Mbps tops.  Remember 2 Mbps translates to about 190 KBps in actual download. To put it in perspective this is approximately $12. But 2.5 GB is not nearly as sufficient for even everyday browsing.By average we go over by about 1 GB, every month. So The total cost would be around 1500 rupees or more (~$35). To help the situation, BSNL gives *Happy Hours* between 2AM and 8AM. During this time, transfers are not metered.  For my use (VPN to USA), This plan is very good.

There are some unlimited plans provided in BSNL.  These however are only limited by their speed.  A 750 rupees($17) per month plan gives you 256 Mpbs.  There is another 1350($30) plan that gives you 512 Mbps. Both of these do not meet my thirst for speed. BSNL recently introduced a 2700 ($60) rupees plan – gives 50 GB – 8Mbps – Line. This is a high end plan for extreme users. But I don't see why BSNL comes up with a limit even on such high priced offerings.

For Tata Photon+, The offers are much simpler. My brother and I use this as contingency service. We use the 999 plan 5GB day and 10GB night (10PM - 6AM) Transfers. Which is a cost-effective alternative for a backup plan.

There are other service providers with multiple options in plans. But BSNL seems the most viable for me.

Popular posts from this blog

Powered By

As it goes, We ought to give thanks to people who power us. This page will be updated, like the version page , to show all the tools, and people this site is Powered By! Ubuntu GIMP Firebug Blogger Google [AppEngine, Ajax and other Apis] AddtoAny Project Fondue jQuery

Decorator for Memcache Get/Set in python

I have suggested some time back that you could modularize and stitch together fragments of js and css to spit out in one HTTP connection. That makes the page load faster. I also indicated that there ways to tune them by adding cache-control headers. On the server-side however, you could have a memcache layer on the stitching operation. This saves a lot of Resources (CPU) on your server. I will demonstrate this using a python script I use currently on my site to generate the combined js and css fragments. So My stitching method is like this @memize(region="jscss") def joinAndPut(files, ext): res = files.split("/") o = StringIO.StringIO() for f in res: writeFileTo(o, ext + "/" + f + "." + ext) #writes file out ret = o.getvalue() o.close() return ret; The method joinAndPut is * decorated * by memize. What this means is, all calls to joinAndPut are now wrapped (at runtime) with the logic in memize. All you wa...

Faster webpages with fewer CSS and JS

Its easy, have lesser images, css and js files. I will cover reducing number of images in another post. But If you are like me, You always write js and css in a modular fashion. Grouping functions and classes into smaller files (and Following the DRY rule, Strictly!). But what happens is, when you start writing a page to have these css and js files, you are putting them in muliple link rel=style-sheet or script tags. Your server is being hit by (same) number of HTTP Requests for each page call. At this point, its not the size of files but the number server roundtrips on a page that slows your page down. Yslow shows how many server roundtrips happen for css and js. If you have more than one css call and one js call, You are not using your server well. How do you achieve this? By concatinating them and spitting out the content as one stream. So Lets say I have util.js, blog.js and so.js. If I have a blog template that depends on these three, I would call them in three script tags. Wh...